Fulton Associates

Saturday, February 5, 2011

Cotton, Oil, Rice Prices a Harbinger for Deflation!

I was reading the G&M this weekend and was perturbed again about the poor understanding and reporting of price inflation. The front page stories in the ROB discus how rising cotton prices are causing food inflation. Ok it does follow that farmers who want to capture the historically high prices of cotton and rice will plant less corn, soy, and wheat. What the article doesn't discuss are the reasons behind the cotton price increase to begin with. Was it some one off fungal blight of this years crop? Or will next year we see a cotton price collapse barring some new cotton t-shirt fad? One real cause of food price inflation over long periods of civilization are population pressures much as we're seeing now in the burgeoning and much talked about emerging nations. Once inflationary fires start, you get positive feedback loops that magnify the misallocations of resources and set the loop into bubble type dynamics. Just like during the initial stages of the housing boom that was fueled by low interest rates, bubble dynamics are hard to pick out as the psychology overtakes the fundamentals.

One other cause for the rush into commodities is the so-called inflation trade because of the real or anticipated increase in the monetary base. QE1, and 2 have done wonders for just about every asset class. This has been true for Ag and this has been especially true for oil as the
Globe reporter points out that this will eventually lead to inflation. I have a problem with this simplistic understanding of inflation and it's causes. Without getting into a long dissertation regarding Monetarism and Austrian economics, let's agree that if the monetary base was held relatively stable, the price increase (some would call this inflation)of oil is inherently deflationary. Simple really: more $ spent on oil and its many derivatives, the less $ for other things. $100 per barrel oil is a deflationary brake on the economy despite Bernanke's disingenious academic sound bytes about trying to "anchor higher inflationary expectations". It's when the monetary authorities increase the monetary base for whatever reason, you start to get price levitation (I'm avoiding the I word)in commodities first.
Eventually because oil and other commodities are used in the production of other products, you will get price inflation in those goods too, followed by wage inflation etc.
I suspect that we'll not see wage inflation like in the 70's because of the current global wage arbitrage and also because we'll have a stagflationary collapse before then.

So how long does this inflationary wave last? Like I said before, it's hard to see through these psychological ponzi dynamics, but as long as quantitative easing is official policy, the fuel is still burning and you want to ride the wave as it catches and explodes. Be careful what you wish for Mr. Fed Chairman.

2 Comments:

At February 7, 2011 at 2:16 PM , Blogger Junk Bonds said...

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/07/opinion/07krugman.html?_r=1&ref=paulkrugman

Hey Mr. Right-wing conspirator, here's what Mr. Krugman says about you. I suppose the truth lies somewhere in the middle.

So ignoring the kooky Austrian economics babble about hard currency, you think there's going to be a prolonged inflationary cycle again. I guess this is an implicit OIH for RY trade rationale. I'm OK with that. I think the big boring bank was bought as a risk mitigator in Dec 2010. Seems the markets are on more stable ground now.

BTW, until and unless the Austrians address the deflationary menu costs, it will never be a viable alternative. One could say the hard currency system has been practiced for 4000+ years upto and including the Great Depression, with a long history of boom-bust cycles. The Fed was created to soften the blow of the business cycle, but leave it to the smart guys to try to game the system and make a little more than normal economic profits.

 
At February 7, 2011 at 10:51 PM , Blogger Des said...

Krugman is an idiot. Now he's blaming the weather! Let's see, if i dig hard enough i can find news of severe weather that destroyed crops in the late nineties and early 2000s so what does that prove. He conveniently uses weather when he feels it supports his arguments.

Look, easy money flows everywhere and right now it's the commodity bandwagon, as it has in past inflationary scares. I'm not sure there's really much demand growth in food. Yah, I know the arguments, richer Chinese guy now eats more meat yada, yada, therefore grain prices today are higher. Maybe in the long term, but not in a year!

The price increases we're seeing are speculation - pure and simple courtesy of the Fed. Why is it that sound currency beliefs must be labelled as right wing conspiracies? I think Mr. Obama and Mr. Bernanke should see what their policies are doing for the jobless and the hungry. I don't see Chef Boyardee getting any easier to afford with the crazy increases in foodstuffs we're seeing.

Ok you're right about the booms and busts of the past 4000 years with hard currency. I'm giving you a lot of credit there! So we're to believe Mr. Krugman that this is really the best way out!? US and European banks still aren't lending, and the housing market looks dead for the foreseeable future. Unemployment is stuck. It looks like a depression to any who doesn't have a job.

So bankers get their bonuses and the Dow takes out new highs. This is all on the dime of $1.5 trillion of fiscal deficit and lord knows how much over $600 billion of QE2 monetization. Pray tell what happens this summer when QE2 comes to an end? Does the US then follow in Japan's path? I guess if private consumption doesn't pick up quick then QE3 is on. That's what Keynes and Krugman would want right.

I'm not sure that we're in a prolonged inflationary cycle. Reason being is that the most powerful group to be bankrupt by out of control inflation are the banks and since they seem to be running the show in the US, I think they stop short of rampant inflation. The inverted yield curve does nasty things to a bank's profitability. This is all assuming of course that Bernanke has such precise control of inflation. If those excess reserves that the Fed has so generously handed out to the privileged banks gets out in the form of loans, get ready for some serious 'velocity'.

your humbled right wing conspirator.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home