Fulton Associates

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

Emerging Markets

Friends,

I often use a top-down approach to choose my investments: selecting a sector or region first, and then choosing particular stocks or funds. In that regard, in this post I am proposing to invest a portion of our portfolio in emerging economies.

The following reasons can be considered for this proposal:
• The downside is large: emerging markets are highly volatile; and even worse they may be a bubble that may burst at any moment. But we should not focus only on the downside. The upside is large too: emerging markets have been outperforming the developed ones in the past few years, and it is likely that they continue growing in future. So it should be considered as an investment with high risk and high potential reward.
• Exposure to the emerging markets can help diversify our portfolio. The Canadian market is less than 3% of the word financial market and the US economy is slowing down. But the emerging markets (and the emerging economies) are taking a larger share of the world’s market. For instance, exposure to emerging markets helped Eddie’s and my portfolio recover swiftly during the recent/current financial crisis (would be more difficult without such diversification).
• Underlying economies are healthy. In fact they are often referred to as engines of the world economy; and that they should/may help the US and the rest of the developed economies go though the slow down and avoid a deep recession. “IMF figures show that Asia, not America, has been the main driver of global demand, powering the world economy through its fastest five-year period of growth since the early 1970s.”
• Decoupling! I agree that decoupling may not make sense in the current integrated world (perhaps it is a bad term). But emerging countries are becoming “less” dependent on the US. The percentage of export to the US is decreasing, as trade and “demand” within the emerging countries (e.g. in Asia) increases. “China's exports to America have fallen from 34% of its total exports in 1999 to 25% now”.
• Bubble factor: I am not in a position to judge whether the market in Asia is a bubble or not. But if it is a bubble, it may still continue to grow for years before it bursts. There are many documents arguing that the situation is China for example is still far from what we had in dot com bubble. “The NASDAQ composite index saw a gain of more than 500% from 1995 to early 2000. Japan's Nikkei 225 jumped by 300% from 1984 to 1989. The Shanghai A-share index, having recovered most of its plunge in late May, shows a gain of about only 160% over the past five years. Moreover, Chinese A-shares now have an average price-earnings (p/e) ratio of around 45. At their peaks, the average p/e ratio of the Nikkei 225 in 1989 and the NASDAQ at the start of 2000 were both well over 100.”

Perhaps none of the above is new for any of you. So just consider them as a “collection” of the available arguments in support of investing in emerging markets. I also know that for any of these arguments there are counter arguments. So the decision is up to you. If there is enough interest we can continue discussing the available alternatives, and details. If not we can simply pursue other investment options.

Links to supporting documents:
• America drops, Asia shops: Thanks to the vigour of Asia's consumers, it is a good time for the American economy to slow. http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=8057575
• The alternative engine: A sharp slowdown in the American economy could be offset by the growing and largely unrecognised power of Asia's consumers. http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=8049652
• The boiling point: How does China's bubble compare with previous financial manias? http://www.economist.com/finance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9370662
• The great wall of money: China's economy may be less vulnerable to a bursting of the stockmarket bubble than it appears. http://www.economist.com/finance/economicsfocus/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=9225696
• If an economic bubble bursts in China, will anyone notice? http://www.globeinvestor.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20071024.wibasia24/GIStory/

4 Comments:

At October 30, 2007 at 11:33 PM , Blogger Junk Bonds said...

The points are well made, I would like some exposure to Emerging Markets, EEM etf :)
Perhaps we can use the volatility to buy at a good price.

 
At October 30, 2007 at 11:38 PM , Blogger Des said...

How would you propose to play the emerging markets? Would BRIC suffice or would you go broader than this? I suppose my style of investing in the past has been different than yours in terms of the diversification you seek. I'm not averse to diversifying
industries or countries, but I like to focus on my best ideas and then load up! Good ideas - I mean really good ideas come rarely and when they do and you can realize them for what they are, you just have to capitalize. But if you're diversifying to minimize correlation between markets, then I don't buy it. Quite frankly I think beta as well as capital asset pricing model (CAPM) is crap. I know Eddie's read this article and I think it is a good one.

http://www.investorsinsight.com/otb_va.aspx?EditionID=461

So is there a specific country or fund that has been temporarily been beaten up that is compelling at this moment? What makes emerging markets interesting at their level today? I guess I'd be happier buying into the emerging markets after some type of real correction in the U.S. which would likely trigger corrections in most markets. If the dynamics of the emerging markets are as we understand them, they are well positioned to recover as compared to the American situation. Also do you see this as a short, medium, or long term holding?
In summary I think I'm hard wired to shun growth stories. Apple for instance - innovative design, trendy products, high demand, and likely to continue in the near term. I just don't buy it.

 
At October 31, 2007 at 11:25 PM , Blogger Junk Bonds said...

For the record, I read the article and I don't believe "CAPM or beta" is crap. They have their uses for funds and etfs, less so for individual stocks.

And why are you shunning growth? You just said during times of tight credit, growth outperforms value investing.

Again for growth investing, I like to enter at a good price, like when there is an over-done correction (high beta). Unfortunately, we cannot wait for the correction to take a vote.

So is there some other investing ideas? I understand we earn 4.75% sitting on cash in Etrade.

 
At November 1, 2007 at 10:02 PM , Blogger Des said...

I suppose I'm shunning growth because I've had more recent success with contrarian investing as well as buying deep cyclicals close to the low. The growth stocks that I have bought in the past have been good stories but bad investments.
In terms of CAPM and using beta as a measure of risk - you know where I stand on its use. I just don't want to see this club turn into a mutual fund where we're talking Sharpe ratios etc..
If we decide that there is only one investment that is compelling at this moment, then I have no problem putting 100% of the money in it or say even 50%, and waiting for another good idea. I'm here to make money on the best ideas, not to diversify or to hedge my personal portfolio.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home